"Civil Disobedience" and Today
At first glance, there may seem to be a large discrepancy
between today’s America and our government, and those which Henry David Thoreau
describes in Civil Disobedience. However, the chasm is not as large as
one may think. Yes, Americans may be more outspoken today, either for better or
worse, but that does not necessarily mean they are more free from government.
Rather, it can be argued we are more chained to government than we would like
to believe so. One sole question now persists, why is this the case? The short
answer is because we let the government get too large.
Now for
the lengthier, more complicated answer. There is only a limited amount of
freedom that an individual can have. The most amount of freedom is in an
anarchist society and the least is in a society engulfed by communism. In other
words, the more control the government has, the less freedom the individuals
have. So why don’t we live in an anarchist society? This society would just
lead to mob rule, which ultimately forms an unfair ruling entity that basically
acts as either a fascist, socialist, communist, or some form of oppressive
government. Okay, now it’s been established we need some form of government to
protect its people but also allow them freedom. That’s what our Founding
Fathers thought; a government to protect. However, as time went on, and the 20th
century came, the American government was granted evermore power by the people
as a larger portion of the people began depending on the government. Thus, they
gave up more of their freedom. This general trend of relying on the government
as if it is some omniscient all-savior has only grown to the brink where complete
control by the state is no longer viewed as a dystopia but rather welcomed by a
significant portion of Americans. Yet, these same people are shouting that they
want freedom as they are supposedly oppressed. It is actually ironic.
In
short, we currently live and have lived for a long time under a government which
we rely too heavily on. And who is to blame? The people. Now, it is important
to understand not all Americans want or have ever wanted a more powerful
government as they believe, “That government is best which governs least,” so
my anger only lies with those who complain they don’t like the policies emplaced
by the state when they, themselves voted for those policies and their
corresponding politicians (Thoreau 382). I briefly mentioned this during the Socratic
Seminar, as how students taking a stand against standardized testing in public
schools was useless as they would only be at a loss with all the repercussions.
If you want the government to control
something and then let it, you are at fault when the results are not on par
with your expectations. In my opinion, the modern civil disobedience is not to take
a stand or call for action, but to first realize the more the state controls and has jurisdiction over,
the less freedom you have, and then vote and/or advocate for the appropriate
policies and politicians.
I agree with your standpoint of trying the change the government in order to spark real change in society. Trying to renounce government control of your lifestyle will only result in a war of attrition with the government in which you will always lose.
ReplyDelete